The confidence gap in forensic science
In forensic science, maths anxiety often emerges when students are asked to interpret data or draw conclusions from statistical information, situations that require them to apply quantitative reasoning with understanding rather than rote calculation. Many students don’t have a strong background in maths, and when numerical reasoning is required, some switch off. One common pattern is hesitation in class discussions, as students worry about giving a wrong answer aloud.
This illustrates a wider confidence gap: students may have the underlying skills to complete calculations correctly, but past negative experiences with maths make them less likely to trust their ability in a subject-specific context. The challenge, as educators report, is not ability, but prior exposure and confidence.
Making maths relevant in forensic science
Across forensic science programmes, educators are finding that confidence grows when numerical work is connected to real scientific tasks. Rather than treating maths as a separate hurdle, it is embedded within the authentic problems students encounter in their forensic modules.
This principle underpins the design of our Quantitative Skills Smart Worksheets for Forensics, co-developed with academics to reflect the specific calculation, decisions, and reasoning students must use in real contexts. For example, students may need to plot graphs to create standard curves for determining the concentrations of unknown samples. Providing the context of “why” these calculations matter helps students understand the purpose behind the maths and interpret their results more effectively.
To support this, Smart Worksheets enable students to repeatedly practise plotting standard curves, calculating concentrations, and interpreting data, all within a clear forensic context. Immediate feedback helps learners understand not just whether an answer is correct, but why, reinforcing both competence and confidence. This structured, contextualised practice helps students see the relevance of numerical reasoning and makes engaging with calculation feel purposeful rather than intimidating.
Safe practice builds confidence
Building confidence in quantitative skills requires more than exposure to content; students need space to try, reflect and try again. When students practise without fear of judgement, their understanding deepens and their confidence begins to grow. This is the value of a genuinely low-stakes environment; it turns practice into exploration rather than performance.
Our Quantitative Skills Smart Worksheets support this by offering interactive, repeatable practice with immediate, structured feedback. Students can work through calculations at their own pace, check their reasoning, and learn from errors in real time, reflecting the learning cycle that underpins long-term conceptual understanding.
Since their launch in 2024, the Quantitative Skills resources have seen more than 6,000 attempts by 3,000 learners, generating approximately 181,000 answers. Each attempt represents a moment of practice that helps students build both competence and trust in their own work.
Collaboration, context and confidence
Addressing maths anxiety in forensics isn’t about simplifying the content, it’s about making learning feel meaningful. That is why each Quantitative Skills resource is created in close collaboration with academics who understand the nuances of numeracy in their discipline. Their insight ensures the support isn’t generic; it reflects the real challenges students encounter in their lectures, labs, and assessments.
Working alongside educators like Dr Kirkham means the resources carry the same principle that guides their teaching: confidence grows when students can see how maths fits into the story of their science, not as something separate from it.
As more departments embed contextualised numeracy into their teaching, the message becomes clear: when students are supported to make sense of the numbers, they begin to trust themselves, and that confidence transforms how they learn.